ABSTRACT
@#BACKGROUND: It is challenging to establish peripheral intravenous access in adult critically patients. This study aims to compare the success rate of the first attempt, procedure time, operator satisfaction with the used devices, pain score, and complications between intraosseous (IO) access and central venous catheterization (CVC) in critically ill Chinese patients. METHODS: In this prospective clustered randomized controlled trial, eight hospitals were randomly divided into either the IO group or the CVC group. Patients who needed emergency vascular access were included. From April 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018, each center included 12 patients. We recorded the data mentioned above. RESULTS: A total of 96 patients were enrolled in the study. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding sex, age, body mass index, or operator satisfaction with the used devices. The success rates of the first attempt and the procedure time were statistically significant between the IO group and the CVC group (91.7% vs. 50.0%, P<0.001; 52.0 seconds vs. 900.0 seconds, P<0.001). During the study, 32 patients were conscious. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the pain score associated with insertion. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding the pain score associated with IO or CVC infusion (1.5 vs. 0.0, P=0.044). Complications were not observed in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: IO access is a safe, rapid, and effective technique for gaining vascular access in critically ill adults with inaccessible peripheral veins in the emergency departments.
ABSTRACT
@#The method of placing an implant immediately into the fresh extraction socket at the same time as tooth extraction has the advantages of reducing the number of operations and the overall treatment time, making full use of the existing bone mass, and resulting in ideal aesthetic effects. However, immediate implant placement also has its own inherent shortcomings. Due to the existence of the extraction socket, it is difficult to close the wound; because the size of the implant does not match the size of the extraction socket, it is difficult to achieve good initial stability, and there is a risk of soft tissue recession. This article reviews the success rate, indications and expansion of immediate implant placement, surgical requirements, complications and the prevention and treatment of anterior teeth in the aesthetic area. A literature review showed that the 5-year success rate of immediate implant placement was over 95%. The indications included intact socket walls, a facial bone wall at least 1 mm in thickness, the presence of thick, soft tissue, the absence of acute infection at the site, and the availability of bone apically and lingually to the socket to provide primary stability. In addition, in recent years, with the improvement of surgical implantation technology and the improvement of bone substitute material performance, immediate implant placement can be used as one of the conventional methods for oral implantation treatment, and its indications have shown a trend toward expansion. Immediate implant placement also has complications, including poor placement of implants and gingival receding that results in poor aesthetic outcomes. In addition, immediate restoration and conventional loading protocols after immediate implant appear to have similar outcomes and result in better aesthetic effects. However, the long-term stability and patient satisfaction after immediate implant placement in terms of soft tissue aesthetics require more research.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the time consumed for the procedure done,satisfaction and safety of the establishment of intraosseous (IO) access and central intravenous line placement (CVL) in critically ill patients using a randomized controlled trial.Methods The patients were randomly divided into the IO access group versus CVL group according to the inclusion criteria.The IO access and CVL were established,respectively for medicine or fluid administration.The success rates at the first attempt,time required for procedure completed,satisfaction and complications were recorded.Results During the study period,24 patients were enrolled,and divided equally and randomly into IO group (n=12) and CVL group (n=12).There were no significant differences in age,gender,BMI between the two groups.The patients with shock and cardiac arrest accounted for 83.3 ％ in IO group and 58.3 ％ in CVL group,respectively.The success rates at the first attempt was 91.7 ％ in IO access group versus 66.7 ％ in CVL group (P=0.158).the time required for procedure done was significantly shorter in IO access group (74.9 ±43.7)s compared with CVL group (944.0 s±491.5 s) (P＜0.01).The satisfaction of operators at the instruments used was 8.0±1.1 for IO access group versus 7.2±0.8 for CVL group (P==0.053).The overall satisfaction of the operators at the entire course of procedure was 3.7 + 0.7 in IO access group versus 3.9±0.3 in CVL group (P=0.377).Complications were not observed during the study period in the two groups.Conclusions The success rate at the first attempt was significantly higher in IO access group compared with CVL grouThe mean time consumed for procedure completed in IO group was much shorter than that in CVL group,and the operation was simple and practicable.During the emergency care of critical patients,if the peripheral intravenous line placement was difficult to establish,and IO access could be a choice of alternative used as a bridging procedure to rapidly establish the vascular access and win the rescue opportunity.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical characteristics of pseudophakic retinal detachment(RD) as RD is the most common sight-threatening complication after cataract surgery. METHODS: We analysed retrospectively the clinical characteristics of 22 pseudophakic RD patiens(23 eyes) which had been operated from January 1993 to December 1997 and followed for 6 months or longer at the Gyeongsang National University Hospital. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was sixty-three and male predominated 19 eyes(82.6%). According as types of IOL implantation included 14 eyes with posterior chamber IOL, 7 eyes with sclera-fixated IOL, 2 eyes with anterior chamber IOL, and 16 eyes(70%) occurred the posterior casule rupture. The interval between IOL implantation and the development of RD was 9.6 months on average and 78% of eyes developed RD within 1 year. In eyes with sclera-fixated IOL, the interval was shorter than others, In cases with ruptured posterior capsule, RD occurred earlier than those with intact posterior capsule. Retinal breaks were principally located in the upper quadrants in 12 eyes(63%) and horseshoe tear was most commmonly encountered. RD involving 3 or more quadrants was observed in 12 eyes(51%) of patients, and macular detachment in 18 eyes(78%). Anatomic success achieved in 83%. The most common cause of the failure was the development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Visual results in eyes with ultimate anatomic success of RD repair improved 0.5 or more in 80% if the macula was not involved and in 14.2% if the macula was involved. CONCLUSION: We thought that thorough fundus examination is neccessary during the follow-up of pseudophakic eye with posterior capsule rupture and sclera-fixated IOL after cataract surgery.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Anterior Chamber , Cataract , Follow-Up Studies , Retinal Detachment , Retinal Perforations , Retinaldehyde , Retrospective Studies , Rupture , Vitreoretinopathy, ProliferativeABSTRACT
Conventional Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy[CDCR]which is performed for canalicular obstruction or failed DCR, is well known as one of the most effective treatment modalities. The authors compared surgical results of endoscopic with those of conventional method to evaluate advantages of endoscopic method over conventional CDCR and important success factors. Primary success rates were 90%[86/96]in endoscopic method and 86%[214/217]in conventional method. Final success rates were 97%[93/96]and 96%[237/247]in endoscopic and conventional method, respectively[p>0.05]. We considered that endoscopic method was superior to conventional method in accurate measurement of Jones tube length at the time of endoscopic operation. It was considered the most important success factor.
ABSTRACT
Endonasal DCR has been reported for the advantages of lack of a cutaneous scar and short operating time but that the surgical success rates were lower than conventional method. We have performed endonasal DCR and had follow-up of at least 6 months in 107 patients who had been diagnosed with lacrimal pathway obstruction, and also surveyed the age, sex, sac size and nasal cavity abnormality to evaluate the factors related to success rate. Primary success rates were 82.2%(88eyes) and higher success rates were noted in younger age, man and large sac but not significant. But. the cases associated with nasal cavity abnormality as septal deviation, middle turbinate hypertrophy, ethmoiditis and polyp showed poor surgical results due to membranous ostium closure, formation of granuloma within the ostium, and formation of cicatrix with the middle turbinate.(P<0.05) Improvement of success rate may be owing to appropriate preoperative evaluation, proper management of nasal cavity abnormality preoperatively and intraoperatively, and show consider the conventional method in cases of that lower success rate are predict.